• Users Online: 181
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page
Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2016  |  Volume : 22  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 15-20

Comparison between Intracameral Adrenaline Injection in Addition to Topical Mydriatics and Topical Mydriatics only in Phacoemulsfication Surgery


Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt

Correspondence Address:
Nesma Y.A. El-Morsy
Department of Opthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, Alexandria, 21500
Egypt
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/1687-6997.194366

Rights and Permissions

Purpose The aim of the present study was to compare the pupil diameter in cases injected with intracameral adrenaline intraoperatively, in addition to topical mydriatics, and cases that received topical mydriatics only. In addition, this study aimed at assessing the systemic and local side effects of the two techniques. Patients and methods The study was conducted on a total of 80 consecutive eyes that underwent phacoemulsification surgery. Patients with different types of cataract requiring phacoemulsification were included in this study. The patients were randomized and divided into two groups. The first group (50 cases) received intraoperative bolus adrenaline injection intracameraly, in addition to preoperative topical mydriatics. The pupil diameter was measured twice, once after topical mydriatics and the second time after intracameral adrenaline injection. The second group (30 cases) received benoxinate hydrochloride 4 mg (Benox) preoperatively as a topical anesthetic, and tropicamid 1% (Mydriacil) as mydriatic. The pupil diameter was measured by using a squint caliper after mydriacyl. Results The mean preoperative pupil diameter in the first group was 6.76 ± 0.90 mm. Patients in the first group had smaller pupils. The mean preoperative pupil diameter in the second group was 8.07 ± 0.68 mm. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant. On the other hand, the mean pupil diameter after intracameral adrenaline injection was 7.91 ± 1.01 mm, which was statistically different as adrenaline dilated the pupil. Conclusion The present study revealed better pupil dilatation in cases with narrower pupil when injected with intracameral adrenaline than in cases with topical mydriatic only, with no local or systemic side effects.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed151    
    Printed0    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded32    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal